Discussion
Loading...

Post

  • About
  • Code of conduct
  • Privacy
  • Users
  • Instances
  • About Bonfire
Altomare
@altomare@oldbytes.space  ·  activity timestamp 3 weeks ago

Some neat info about 70s hard drive contaminants.

From the DEC RK05 disk drive maintenance manual (DEC-00-HRK05-C-D)

#retrocomputing #dec

""Relationship of Disk Head, Disk, and Contaminants"

Graph showing a side/cutoff view of hard drive reading head over the platter, with size comparisons:
* Space between the head & platter: 100µ
* Smoke particle: 250µ
* Fingerprint smudge: no unit but it's drawn twice as big as the smoke particle
* Lint & dust: no unit either, 4 times bigger(ish) than the smudge
* Humar hair: .004"

The oxide layer on the disk is 200µ wid
""Relationship of Disk Head, Disk, and Contaminants" Graph showing a side/cutoff view of hard drive reading head over the platter, with size comparisons: * Space between the head & platter: 100µ * Smoke particle: 250µ * Fingerprint smudge: no unit but it's drawn twice as big as the smoke particle * Lint & dust: no unit either, 4 times bigger(ish) than the smudge * Humar hair: .004" The oxide layer on the disk is 200µ wid
""Relationship of Disk Head, Disk, and Contaminants" Graph showing a side/cutoff view of hard drive reading head over the platter, with size comparisons: * Space between the head & platter: 100µ * Smoke particle: 250µ * Fingerprint smudge: no unit but it's drawn twice as big as the smoke particle * Lint & dust: no unit either, 4 times bigger(ish) than the smudge * Humar hair: .004" The oxide layer on the disk is 200µ wid
  • Copy link
  • Flag this post
  • Block
Log in

Kakapo Social

Kakapo Social: About · Code of conduct · Privacy · Users · Instances
Bonfire social · 1.0.0 no JS en
Automatic federation enabled
  • Explore
  • About
  • Members
  • Code of Conduct
Home
Login