@aplanteatingant I don't know SailfishOS first-hand yet, have no experience with it. I've considered doing it anyway and pay for the C2, but in the end 550€ is too much money for something I don't know I'd actually enjoy. The Xperia 10 V is just an option because 200€ is considerably cheaper, and I know I could also flash it to /e/OS of which I know works well as daily driver for me.
Fairphone's problem is that they are obscenely over priced for no clear reason.
In my mind, pixels are the best compromise..
longevity, good features, unlockable bootloaders.
There are no purely good choices in this domain, only shades of bad and worse.
If pinephone can make a $150.00 ish smart phone, why can't Fairphone?
Something doesn't add up here.
@FelisCatusDomesticus @Fairphone I don't see how the Fairphone 6 is "obscenely overpriced"? In my region it costs 550€, that's considerably less compared to many other phones while providing something way better and many years of updates.
I can't find any 150$ phone from Pine64 either, only their extremely outdated Pinephones with the Pro being at 600€ and out of stock too. I'm somewhat confused about your arguments.
@Nicro @Fairphone Don't really agree on the current Fairphone having lesser specs, the hardware they used this time is quite capable. The IP rating of course is a thing.
https://www.gsmarena.com/fairphone_6-13955.php
Their current pricing (550€ for the newest device) seems rather reasonable honestly, compared to other phones and given they need to offset not making all those bloody ad- and preinstalled-system-app deals in this broken economy.
@Natanox i would've actually considered a fairphone but i can't bring myself to take USB 2.0 phones in 2026 seriously
@aurelia My current OnePlus 7 Pro got USB-C 3.1 and in 7 years I never found a real usecase for it. The storage / protocol isn't fast enough and tethered internet never goes over 40mb/s anyway. MHL doesn't seem to be concerned with the USB standard either.
Of course it would be nicer, but if 2.0 makes the device a little bit cheaper and more affordable for more people I'm okay with that personally.
@Natanox About
#SailfishOS: #Jolla is currently also doing a preorder of a new phone: https://commerce.jolla.com/products/jolla-phone-preorder
@aplanteatingant I don't know SailfishOS first-hand yet, have no experience with it. I've considered doing it anyway and pay for the C2, but in the end 550€ is too much money for something I don't know I'd actually enjoy. The Xperia 10 V is just an option because 200€ is considerably cheaper, and I know I could also flash it to /e/OS of which I know works well as daily driver for me.
@Natanox To get the best impression of what it's like to use a Sailfish OS smartphone, I would recommend getting a used Xperia 10 III first. It is the last Xperia model officially supported by #Jolla. With the Xperia 10V, there will still be slight hardware limitations. #sailfishOS https://shop.jolla.com/details/12596a34-597b-47d4-a502-c0ef15d2a4de/ @aplanteatingant
@Cykelsok @aplanteatingant SailfishOS lists the Xperia V though? I targeted it given it's the most modern of the listed smartphones, aside of the C2. https://docs.sailfishos.org/Support/Supported_Devices/
@Natanox@chaos.social @Fairphone@social.weho.st i wouldn't let the annoying android evangelists at grapheneos keep me from choosing the more ethical option here
@zaire@fedi.absturztau.be @Natanox@chaos.social @Fairphone@social.weho.st i'd choose a fairphone or a pinephone, to install PostmarketOS (or other mobile linux distros) on.
Because of the dirastic changes of google, i will no longer buy phones whose bootloader cannot be unlocked.
(i preferred postmarketos first because it has the most support overall, a nice community, and is lightweight.)
@a_blahaj@blahaj.zone @Natanox@chaos.social yep yep something with pmOS support is a nobrainer. then google can fuck themselves in all the holes thrice over and you won't feel it
@Natanox@chaos.social @a_blahaj@blahaj.zone the graphene devs are damn annoying like that 90% of the time. they have that worship of the Android Security Model ™ (the one invented by google to justify giving the user 0 control over the device their own) that takes highest priority over everything
@zaire @a_blahaj To be fair, security is their whole stick and the fact they managed to make it so secure whole governments are pissed off and try to frame it as a tool for criminals (French police semi-officially treats it as "highly suspicious item") because their cracking tools don't work is quite an achievement.
It's just so fucking annoying how they or their followers keep trash-talking *everything* else at any opportunity or even accuse other projects of having an agenda against them.
